Talk:Alan Keyes
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alan Keyes article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Alan Keyes. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Alan Keyes at the Reference desk. |
Alan Keyes was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Abortion
[edit]At footnote 29, the article states that republican leaders found his debate questions on abortion 'unnecessary and divisive' the article in the Washington Post which is supposed to support this statement merely states that he asked 'pointed' questions about abortion and not how republican leaders might have felt about this - if the comment in the article is true then it ought to be referenced properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TTID (talk • contribs) 15:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Racial commentary & media
[edit]I broke up the section on media and advocacy and moved the racial commentary under its own header. Is this an improvement?
Revised: "Keyes has repeatedly spoken in themes of race and racism, often accusing others of racism." This is a silly exaggeration. (Jesse Jackson, et al, would give Keyes a run for the money in the racism-accusing department.)
Following that statement were examples of the alleged accusations of racism. The accusations regarding media racism were easily verified, sourced, and corrected. The paragraph below no so:
- In 1987 Keyes reportedly accused Deputy Secretary of State John C. Whitehead of racially insulting him and then quit his post there. Media reports also claimed Keyes accused the Republican National Committee of racism in 1992 when the GOP did not give him a prime speaking spot at the Republican National Convention (the RNC later gave him 2 speaking spots). Keyes would apparently again accuse the GOP of racism when they pulled their support for his trailing candidacy for the Senate in Maryland.
Unless the above can be verified and sourced, it likely falls under the exaggeration category typical of this page, and deserves the axe (or at least more tweaking). The words reportedly, claimed, and apparently were added by me to give some balance to the unproven statements. There is always another side to the story. That is missing from this paragraph (and from much of this page, for that matter).
I have spent the day cleaning up this page from its slew of inaccuracies, wrong dates, quotes used without context, positions on issues actually reversed, and editorializing. I would like to see the important facts surrounding this public figure expanded, and the irrelevancies and obvious pot-shots reduced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.41.173.145 (talk) 09:36, 22 June 2005 (UTC)
response
[edit]Alan Keyes' response to his daughter's sexuality is absolutely relevant to this entry. Can someone who is not interested in censoring this entry properly append it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.167.171.0 (talk) 23:17, August 23, 2007 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
[edit]- This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Alan Keyes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
This 2007 promotion does not meet the GA criteria as:
- It has multiple cleanup tags like [citation needed]
- Various unreliable sourced like "Buyingofthepresident.org", "ashbrook.org", "Ontheissues.org", "www.politics1.com", "www.renewamerica.us", etc. are used.
- Prose issues: Overuse of quotations, grammar and flow issues. Lead does not accurately summarize the topic.
- Neutrality issues: The article does not maintain a neutral point of view. Statements like "He went on the offensive against his opponents during the debate ...", etc.
– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Almost 4 monthes, no significant changes. Delisting – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Brazilian Philosopher
[edit]Article needs an update: Brazilian philosopher is now dead. 2604:2D80:D296:D400:8170:25E1:29AE:F730 (talk) 02:28, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class African diaspora articles
- Mid-importance African diaspora articles
- WikiProject African diaspora articles
- C-Class International relations articles
- Low-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- C-Class WikiProject Illinois articles
- High-importance WikiProject Illinois articles
- C-Class Maryland articles
- Low-importance Maryland articles
- WikiProject Maryland articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- C-Class American politics articles
- Low-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Conservatism articles
- Mid-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- C-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class United States presidential elections articles
- Low-importance United States presidential elections articles
- WikiProject United States presidential elections articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Higher education articles
- WikiProject Higher education articles